This is certainly an illustration essay on Effects of The Patriot Act.

This is certainly an illustration essay on Effects of The Patriot Act.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations expressed in this material are the ones associated with the authors and never necessarily reflect the views of LawTeacher.

The USA PATRIOT Act (Patriot Act) was established after September 11, 2001 (9/11) when terrorists attacked the usa.

The Patriot Act has raised many concerns about whether it infringes from the civil liberties of the people of this nation. Looking back of all time, our past presidents developed laws that were the stepping stone for the ideas that created the Patriot Act. The government’s job is always to protect the people, but it has a bigger job which will be to guard the world. This has raised issues that are many the Patriot Act and whether or not it is more detrimental to us than it really is helpful. The american people should be concerned with how much power our government has when developing laws governing our civil liberties in relation to the Patriot Act and how it deprives those accused under it of Constitutional rights.

On 11, 2001 the United States (US) experienced the unthinkable when terrorists attacked the country on its own soil september. This is a serious eye opener or should I say reality look for the usa. The usa has some of the most extremely counter that is sophisticated on earth but was struggling to prevent such a tragedy. Why didn’t they notice it coming? Lots of thing could be today that is different that question could half been answered prior to 9/11.


This act was compiled from two documents, the Provide Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (PATRIOT) from the House of Representatives (House) while the Uniting and Strengthening American (USA) Act through the Senate, was merged together creating the Patriot Act. Relating to Lemieux, previous laws that are developed by previous presidents to eliminate conflicts were like the Patriot Act they just had different names Lemieux, M. (n.d.). Reputation for the USA Patriot Act. Retrieved 9, 2011, from http://www.constitutiondenied.com/Media/History-Patriot-Act.pdf april. The Aliens and Sedition Act of 1798 was created during the pugilative war with France since the US was afraid for the country together with people and wanted to make sure the enemy did not sleep amongst us. With this power the president was able to have anyone who was believed to be a threat to your government could be arrested and deported. Throughout the Civil War the president suspended Habeas Corpus when it comes to safety benefits of the nation, giving the government the power to imprison someone without sufficient evidence. During World War II, the President ordered over 10,000 American citizens that had not shown any disloyalty to the united states of america into confinement camps because they were of Japanese descent Lemieux, M. (n.d.). History of the united states Patriot Act. Retrieved 9, 2011, from http://www.constitutiondenied.com/Media/History-Patriot-Act.pdf april. These are the stepping stone behind the development of the Patriot Act.

The Patriot Act came into existence as a response towards the tragic events of 9/11. The bill that will turned out to be known as the Patriot Act was introduced to Congress just days after 9/11. It had been revised due to concerns from many congressmen that the bill allowed for too broad of a scope of power to authorities that are federal. Eventually after the bill was revised and reintroduced, Congress passed it with little opposition on October 26, 2001. Senator Russell Feingold (D-WI), would up being the senator that is only vote resistant to the Patriot Act. Even though the Patriot Act would not come into existence until after 9/11, it will have roots in earlier legislation. On April 25, 1996, President Clinton signed the Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act into law. The balance for this law was introduced following the Oklahoma City Bombing. The most important provision of the act caused it to be illegal to produce support that is“material to any organization banned because of the state dept.. The balance was greatly criticized by Republicans for granting power that is too much authorities. The balance had to undergo major modifications before it had been passed in 1996. The bill that finished up becoming law was reported to be a “watered down version” for the original that President Clinton wanted passed. Strangely enough, it was this act that has been revamped and broadened to generate the Patriot Act (Creative Commons, n.d.).

Since becoming law, the Patriot Act has been highly criticized to be extremely broad and too open for interpretation. In 2004, a judge ruled that components of the Patriot Act were unconstitutional because they were too vague as well as in violation of this First and Fifth Amendments. Another criticism for the Patriot Act is that it generally does not guarantee oversight that is enough make sure that those who are given power by the act usually do not misuse it. On March 9, 2006 President Bush signed the Patriot Act Reauthorization, but attached a signing statement in that he said which he would ignore specific mandates printed in the bill that will give more judicial and Congressional oversight to agencies authorized use of the act. In late March, letters were written to Alberto Gonzales, the Attorney General during the time, requesting to have the administration rescind the signing statement given that they would not have force of law. In those letters, they cited Article 1, Section 7 for the Constitution which states that ‘Every bill which shall have passed the House of Representatives additionally the Senate, shall, if he approve he shall sign it, however, if not he shall send it back. before it become a Law, be presented to your President associated with the United States;’ Alberto Gonzales and President Bush both ignored the letters rather than responded. Their argument was that the president could not change legislation that had been passed by Congress and say that he did not agree with that he would ignore part of it. On 10, 2007, an appeals court upheld the 2004 ruling that parts of the Patriot Act were unconstitutional december. The court stated that a statute must allow for a person of average intelligence to be able to read and understand the law in the ruling. They discovered that certain areas of the act were too vague. They determined that then the average person would not know if they were committing a crime (Creative Commons, n.d.) if the law was worded in a way that the average person could not understand,.

Even though many believe that our threat that is terrorist from countries is excellent, there is also the fear of terrorist attacks from the US by its own citizens. The Oklahoma City Bombing is a example that is tragic. In some cases, there clearly https://essaywritersite.com/write-my-paper-for-me was a necessity when it comes to government to suspect an American citizen and do surveillance to safeguard the nation from another such tragedy. The government happens to be espionage that is doing for longer than many people think. It is not a practice that is new however with the technology we have today, it really is easier for authorities to collect intelligence. And even though they usually have this technology at their disposal that does not imply that the Constitution can be ignored into the true name of protecting the united states.

One of these associated with the Patriot Act getting used in such a way is in the case of Jose Padilla.

He had been a Puerto Rican born citizen who later in his life changed into Islam. He traveled through the entire Middle East and allegedly plotted with al Qaeda terrorists to detonate a “dirty bomb” in a US city. As soon while he stepped off a plane in the usa he had been detained. The Bush Administration claimed which he could possibly be detained and even though he had been an American citizen because he previously been deemed an “enemy combatant” because of the president. He was then held in a brig that is military three . 5 years and was allegedly subjected to torture at the hands of US officials attempting to elicit information from him. During those times, he had been not charged with any crimes though it was said there is overwhelming evidence against him. He was also cut off from all communication together with his family and attorney (Martinez, 2007).

Log In

Create an account